PUT THE POLITICIANS ON THE MINIMUM WAGE AND WATCH HOW FAST THINGS CHANGE
Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?

Why do women deny that dating is selling sex for money?

Why do women deny that dating is selling sex for money?

I’m not angry over this arrangement.

It is what it is.

But why deny it when it’s so glaringly, conspicuously obvious?

Does repeating a lie in your head over and over make it true only in your mind, in the absence of sight and experience?

My beef is not with this arrangement because as long as men want sex more than women, women will always be the sellers.

For example, there will be more female prostitutes that can charge more because men will always want sex more (go in the

nightclub if you don t believe me).

As women can earn money through sex with the demand from many many men, it has evolved into the dating/marriage

arrangement where the guy MUST pay or she will leave (no payment, no sex/relationship).

Paying during dating is not the problem and not where I have my gripe.

But lying about it and holding a false sense of dignity is, when she twists the facts. How can anyone believe something

(dating isn t prostitution) when it is this obvious?”

And why are they angry over the insinuation that it is?

Update : @Single Ugly Aging Feminist – I agree with you fully.

I had to rub my eyes to see for myself if it was real.

Sadly, it is all too real as the air we breathe.

Scary stuff

Update 2: It may be “more than” money for sex.

But within it is money for sex, -4True Equality.

In this instance, the only way he could get sex was through paying, which is

the very definition of prostitution.

So when a gold-digger says she conveniently “loves” a rich guy, it s not prostitution?

Then how was she able to marry a rich guy and will she still be with him if he loses money or if he wasn t rich?

I don t buy your argument at all.

Why is it that women can marry rich men but men cannot live off rich women as easily?

What attributes are in play if a woman aspires to get money in a relationship, 4True Equality?

If sex was not a component as you would say, then why do looks and youth factor in to the amount of money she receives

from men?

Ideally, I would wish everyone to pay equal, or even the guy pays a little bit more.

BUT IT S OUT OF CONTROL!!!!!!

You have to call it what it is.

If it s prostitution, say it s prostitution 
 
Then how was she able to marry a rich guy and will she still be with him if he loses money or if he wasn’t rich? 

Update 3: Other than this, i actually liked the answers here.

Either I had very bad luck or everyone harbors gold-digger tendencies.

Update 4: IF SHE REALLY LIKED/LOVED THE GUY SHE WAS WITH, WHY WOULD IT MATTER SO MUCH IF HE PAID OR

NOT? SO THE ONLY WAY MEN CAN SHOW AFFECTION IS BY MONEY, ACCORDING TO YOU?

Well, no wonder I say what I say

 

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email