Fishing rights remain a stumbling block as EU chief negotiator says no-deal will damage both sides
London and Brussels share a “huge common responsibility” to avoid a no-deal Brexit, Michel Barnier has said ahead of talks in London.
Although both sides have made conciliatory noises this week, Downing Street has warned ahead of the re-booted talks that it is “entirely possible that negotiations will not succeed” because “significant gaps” remain.
EU sources told The Telegraph that fishing would be the easiest of the outstanding issues to solve in the intensive daily negotiations that will continue through the weekend and then in Brussels next week.
Arriving in the English capital wearing a face mask emblazoned with the EU flag, Barnier said: “I think it’s very important to be back at the table. Every day counts. I think we have a huge common responsibility.”
Both sides are seeking an agreement to govern their trading relationship once the UK’s post-Brexit transition period comes to an end in January 2021.
Tariffs and quotas
If a deal can’t be agreed with the EU, then the UK will default to WTO terms from 1 January 2021. Every WTO member has a list of tariffs and quotas that they apply to other countries.
The UK would have to apply tariffs and quotas to goods coming into the country from the EU, and the EU would apply its “third-country” tariffs and quotas to the UK.
That means the UK would be hit by big taxes when it tried to sell products to the EU market. The bloc’s average WTO tariffs are 11.1% for agricultural goods, 15.7% for animal products and 35.4% for dairy.
British car makers would be hit with a 10% tariff on exports to the bloc, which could amount to €5.7bn per year. That would increase the average price of a British car sold in the EU by €3,000.
Currently, trade between the UK and EU is tariff-free. But the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) predicts that no-deal would mean that 90% of the UK’s goods exports to the EU would be subjected to tariffs.
Without a deal, it would have to trade with every WTO member in the world on the best terms it offered any member, including the EU.
In the event of no-deal, the EU would begin imposing border checks on UK products from 1 January 2021, even if the UK hadn’t changed any of its rules and regulations.
The UK government has admitted it expects massive border queues and persistent delays for six months or longer in the UK if it leaves without securing a deal.
France has said it plans to immediately implement post-Brexit border controls at its ports in the event of no-deal. The UK government has estimated that 50% to 85% of lorry drivers would not have the necessary documentation to enter the EU via France,
HMRC has estimated that British businesses would spend £15bn extra a year on paperwork in the event of a “no deal” Brexit, reports
A small number of pro-Brexit economists say that most trade around the world is done on WTO terms, and the UK would still have access to the EU market, says
But many other economists and academics say that crashing out and trading on WTO terms would be damaging for the British economy.
The head of the WTO has warned Johnson that standard trade terms “would slow Britain’s recovery from coronavirus, saying that sticking closer to present arrangements would be better for jobs”, The Times reports.
Roberto Azevedo, director-general of the WTO, said while WTO terms were “not a catastrophe”, they “will impose a number of adjustments and those can be painful, particularly for some sectors”.
The UK exports nearly half (46%) of its goods to the rest of the European Union, making it by far the largest UK export market. And over half (53%) of all UK imports came from the EU in 2018.
The UK’s economy relies heavily on its service industry, with British service providers making up 79% of the UK economy and accounting for 45% of exports. London’s position as a global financial hub would be threatened.
The UK crashing out of the EU with no deal at the end of 2020 isn’t just bad for UK-EU trade, it’s bad for UK trade full-stop, say some critics.
The UK could lose continuity of trade relations with many of the 72 countries that have trade deals in place with the EU, including Canada and Turkey.
Britain is in talks to continue its participation in those agreements, and has so far the government has secured continuity agreements with around a dozen countries.
No-deal would set the UK free from rule-taking
While a no-deal Brexit would mean the UK is no longer subject to EU rules, it would not mean that every rule the UK follows is made in the UK,
“We would remain members of international organisations like NATO and the WTO, and membership of these things means following collective rules or decision-making,” says the fact-checking site.
And the UK will still be subject to the European Court of Human Rights after Brexit. This court isn’t an EU body, and the UK will still remain a member after the transition period ends.
Similar Recent Posts by this Author:
- BREXIT MEANS BREXIT – A NO DEAL IS BREXIT
- NO DEAL- NO EU IMPORTS – UNTIL THE EU SEE SENSE ON TARIFFS
- THE UK MUST REDUCE IMPORTS BY IMPOSING TARIFFS ON EU GOODS IF NO RECIPROCAL AGREEMENT IS REACHED
- BREXIT – BRITAIN’S EXIT HAS BEEN A SHAMBLES – WE SHOULD HAVE LEFT WITHOUT NOTICE ON THE DAY WE INVOKED ARTICLE 24
- WHAT WE EXPORT TO THE EU AND IMPORT FROM THE EU – “There was trade deficit of EUR 22 billion. Between 2002 and 2019″AND THAT MUST STOP
- DEMAND A NO DEAL BREXIT – FISHING LIMITS ARE OURS – NO MORE A SECOND CLASS BRITISH INDUSTRY, INVESTMENT NOT WORTH THE PROFIT !