The word “organic” is used in all sorts of contexts, often in a highly metaphorical manner; the subject here is its use in the phrase “organic foods” in claims of superior healthfulness.
Different jurisdictions have various standards for “organic” food, but generally the label is applied to foods that have been grown without artificial chemicals or pesticides.
Literally, of course, the term is a redundancy: all food is composed of organic chemicals (complex chemicals containing carbon).
There is no such thing as an inorganic food (unless you count water and salt as foods).
Natural fertilizers and pesticides may or may not be superior to artificial ones, but the proper distinction is not between organic and inorganic.
When it comes to nutrition, people tend to generalize rashly from a narrow scientific basis. After a few preservatives were revealed to have harmful effects in some consumers, many products were proudly labeled “No Preservatives!”
I don’t want harmful preservatives in my food, but that label suggests to me a warning: “Deteriorates quickly! May contain mold and other kinds of rot!” Salt is a preservative.
Similar Recent Posts by this Author:
- Glyphosate is the most widely used postemergence herbicide in landscape plantings for several reasons – Glyphosate has little or no soil residual – The Farmers Boy’s first choice if used correctly- Register or read on…-
- IT STARTED WITH THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION – CAPITALISM AND CONGESTION – NOW THE BIG CITIES ARE SUFFERING
- BLACK SPORTSMEN SHOWING DEFERENCE BY KNEELING MUST STOP – INSTEAD THEY MUST STAND UP TALL AND SHOW THE CLENCHED FIST SALUTE TO SHOW UNITY, STRENGTH, DEFIANCE AND RESISTANCE
- 6 ways socialism is superior to capitalism
- SAINSBURYS LABELLING IS DISHONEST AND A DECEITFUL SHAM – BECAUSE THE PRICE PER KG OR GRAMS IS SO SMALL THAT THEY ARE DETERMINED TO CHEAT CUSTOMERS- GET IN TOUCH HERE OR TELL SAINSBURYS
- BRITAIN needs Independence from the EU and US and British Agricultural and Industrial Policies for Britain