Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?

Scottish Land Reform Proposals

Land reform proposals prompt differing responses in Scotland

31 May 2014 | By Olivia Midgley

THERE has been a mixed response to the Land Reform Review Group’s (LRRG) programme for change in Scotland.

The LRRG report puts forward 62 land reform recommendations to Government, including the potential to enforce the sale

of property to community groups and tenant farmers.

The report also calls for the creation of more publicly-funded bodies such as a land commission to look at the sale and

ownership of land.

However, Scottish Land and Estates chairman David Johnstone said funding the changes was likely to be an issue at a time

when public spending was ‘tight’.

He said: “At a time when bodies such as small community housing trusts are struggling for funding to achieve their

objectives, we would suggest if this money exists, those who live and work in rural Scotland could suggest more practical

measures for delivering real solutions for their area than the LRRG has come up with.”

Under the plans, LRRG has proposed to map all land in Scotland which Environment and Climate Change Minister Paul

Wheelhouse said was a ‘vital underpinning step in Scotland’s land reform journey and will ensure at last everyone will know

who owns Scotland’.

Mr Johnstone said the organisation was not opposed to land reform and supports the community buy-out process being

made simpler, ‘however, this should be against the backdrop of a willing seller’.

Ran Morgan, head of Knight Frank Scotland, said the proposals could have a huge impact for landowners.

 He said: “I hope when the Scottish Parliament considers the report’s findings it rejects those aspects which seem to be an

attack on the private ownership of land, rather than a sensible contribution to the land reform debate.”

Scottish Countryside Alliance director Jamie Stewart claimed ‘on first reading we are very concerned’.

 He added: “Although we wholeheartedly support greater community involvement in land ownership and management, we

fear the proposed changes will seriously damage private investment in Scotland which will put the jobs and livelihoods of

thousands of people in the most marginal rural communities at risk.”

Scottish Tenant Farmers Association chairman Christopher Nicholson said it mirrored many of the group’s own proposals.

He said: “Above all, the report establishes the link between land and tenancy reform and provides some clear guidance to

the Agricultural Holdings Legislation Group.”

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email