Coronavirus: Doctors face agonising life-death decisions
Doctors are being told that, as the coronavirus pandemic spreads, they will face “agonising choices” over who gets potentially life-saving treatments.
The British Medical Association has issued ethical guidance for those working on the front line.
The professional body says there needs to be an urgent public debate about the issue in these “unprecedented times”.
It warns that despite “heroic efforts” to boost capacity, the NHS may be overwhelmed.
The government has ordered thousands of ventilators to help ease the pressure on hospitals caused by the coronavirus crisis.
These, along with specialist life-support machines called ECMO (Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation), will be needed for the sickest patients to aid breathing and, when possible, save lives.
Deciding who gets what care
Doctors have to make difficult choices about treatment in their everyday practice, but the coronavirus outbreak means they will have to make life-death decisions more often and sometimes based on capacity rather than just need, the BMA is warning.
The guidelines say:
- All patients should be given compassionate and dedicated medical care, including symptom management and – where patients are dying – the best available end-of-life care
- Nevertheless, it is legal and ethical to prioritise treatment among patients. This applies where there are more patients with needs than there are resources available.
When resources are too scarce and choices have to be made about who to treat, doctors are urged to consider:
- Severity of acute illness
- Presence and severity of co-morbidity
- Frailty or, where clinically relevant, age
The BMA says managers and senior doctors will set “thresholds” for admission to intensive care units – the places where the most sick will need treating with ventilators.
By itself, infection with coronavirus should not guarantee priority for treatment, it says.
Patients whose “probability” of dying, or requiring prolonged intensive support, exceeds the set threshold would not be considered for intensive treatment. They should still receive other forms of medical care, says the advice
Similar Recent Posts by this Author:
- ITS CRIMINAL CARE BUT WORSE ONLY 1% OF UK PATIENTS ARE BEING TREATED IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES UNITS AND CORONAVIRUS IS AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE
- DOCTORS condemned the provision of protective wear as “useless” today, warning that it was putting their lives at risk.
- PANIC AS FACTS ON NHS CUT BACKS CONFIRM THAT HOSPITALS WILL FAIL TO COPE WITH SEVERE CASES OF CORONAVIRUS – TORY POLICIES LEAVE BRITONS UNSAFE
- HOW WHITTY CAN THEY GET – CRAP ALL NHS BUYING PRIVATE HOSPITAL SET UPS WITH YOUR MONEY WHICH YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY BACK
- A HOSPITAL TRUST CANCELS CANCER PATIENTS CONFIRMS THE NHS CEASES TO BE AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE – CANCER TREATMENT IS NOW NOT CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL OR THE NHS FIT FOR PURPOSE DUE TO TORY CUTBACKS & INCOMPETENT MANAGEMENT
- FINALLY A SOLUTION TO THE NHS SENIOR INCOMPETENTS- OUCHWHICH – THE SICK DISABLED WOMEN & CHILDREN TO THE RIGHT – THOSE WHO CAN WORK TO THE LEFT