PUT THE POLITICIANS ON THE MINIMUM WAGE AND WATCH HOW FAST THINGS CHANGE
Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?

Medical- A Caesarian Section saves the Vagina and the Marriage

Caesarean section or vaginal birth – What difference does it make?

 

the Telegraph, women over 40 are three times more likely than women 20-24 to

 

need an emergency c-section. The rates compared as 22.4% versus 6.7%.

 

C Section – BUT ONLY IF YOU CAN GET THE OBSTETRICIAN OUT OF BED

 

and the NHS to Provide the public service – Radical

 

In an issue that focuses on vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) Gina Lowdon and

 

Debbie Chippington Derrick of Caesarean Birth/VBAC Information report on the

 

phenomenon of maternal requests for caesarean sections.

 

Why bother going through the process of giving birth vaginally when you can have

 

a planned caesarean section? Increasing numbers of women today appear to be

 

subscribing to this view. Maternal request for delivery by caesarean section is

 

reportedly on the increase and has been blamed, in part, for the continuing rise in

 

the caesarean section rate.

 

The level of maternal request is a controversial issue. The National Sentinel

 

Caesarean Section Audit report notes that studies report rates of maternal

 

request ranging from 1.5% to 48%

 

1. Much of the variation is due to unclear definitions of ‘maternal

request’ and whether there was also a supporting clinical indication.

But the use of ‘maternal request’ as a reason for carrying out surgery is a non-

 

sense, since it simply indicates who instigated the decision. Clinical indications

 

are not, after all, lumped together under ‘obstetric preference’. Until audits

 

standardise the terminology and sub-divide ‘maternal request’ into the underlying

 

reasons why women prefer to undergo surgery, serious debate of the issue will be

 

hampered.

 

Regardless as to the actual level of maternal request and the methods used to

 

quantify it, there is no denying it is very much an issue of our time. The amount of

 

media coverage and the frequency with which ‘maternal request’ is cited as a

 

barrier to the reduction of caesarean rates, demonstrate that this issue is of

 

concern to a great many, both in the childbirth world and our society as a whole.

 

Why has caesarean delivery apparently become more popular?

 

Since the dawn of time labour and birth through the vaginal passage have been an

 

inevitable consequence of pregnancy, a journey through to life. There was no

 

alternative to vaginal birth, except death.

 

In this new millennium, women do have an alternative, one that has been

 

provided by the wonders of modern technology – women today have choice,

 

something that women in ages past did not have.

 

Why do some women consider caesarean delivery more advantageous and more

 

in keeping with the 21st century?

 

A caesarean is a modern way to have a baby, involving the use of technology.

 

Modern technology features highly in our daily lives. We are at ease with it and

 

find it reassuring. The latest and most up-to-date technological equipment is

 

much prized and sought after in all areas of our lives.

 

A caesarean is a medical operation. Birth is currently seen as a medical event as it

 

usually takes place in hospital. Is a caesarean operation not therefore a logical

 

conclusion to pregnancy for women of this millennium?

 

A caesarean can be scheduled. Few of us can get through a day in our modern

 

world without a watch and a diary. Our daily lives are ruled by time and by

 

carefully planned appointments. Choosing the date of the baby’s birthday has

 

considerable appeal in this context for some women. We have become

 

accustomed to leading our daily lives in a way that pays little heed to the natural

 

flow of events. For example, modern technology allows us, in many respects, to

 

disregard the divisions of night and day or the seasons of the year.

 

A caesarean is quick in comparison to most labours. We live in an age when the

 

quicker something can be achieved the more advantageous it is perceived to be –

 

whether this is making a cup of instant coffee, washing the laundry, travelling

 

from a to b, or sending a communication. In our society time is money.

 

A caesarean is perceived as pain-free. The operation is carried out under

 

anaesthetic and therefore there are no pains of labour to be endured. The “wake

 

me up when it’s all over” scenario appeals to many women.

 

A caesarean avoids the need for a baby to make the journey through the birth

 

canal. Many women worry about how something as large as a baby could possibly

 

fit through such a small opening. Some women fear the baby may be ‘squashed’

 

and damaged in the process.

 

A caesarean is clean. The antiseptic nature of the operating theatre is very

 

different from the physical exertion of labour. No sweat and tears. The mess of

 

amniotic fluid and blood is dealt with out of sight. Urine is catheterised. There are

 

no lumps of poo emerging from the rectum, pushed out by the baby’s head as it

 

journey’s down the vagina. Is this not more in keeping with our aseptic society?

 

A caesarean is clinical – and therein perhaps lies its biggest attraction. Planned

 

caesarean birth avoids the necessity for the many probings of the vagina, which

 

have become routine during what is termed ‘normal’ birth today. A woman can

 

more easily maintain a degree of professionalism and detachment in her

 

relationship with her carers since the private areas of her body are left

 

unmolested and unsullied.

 

With these advantages in mind, does caesarean delivery not fit rather well with

 

the ethos of our society in this new millennium?

 

The problem is, however quick, clean and convenient caesarean delivery may be

 

considered, it also has its disadvantages – the most obvious being the post-

 

operative recovery period. Contrary to popular perception, delivery by caesarean

 

section is far from an ‘easy’ option. Caesarean mothers are never able to jump off

 

the operating table and get straight back to normal.

 

The operation itself may be completely pain free but the post-operative recovery

 

period rarely continues to be so. There is, of course, a range of painkillers to help

 

mothers through the first few days, but even so moving around, handling the baby

 

and going to the toilet, all present their own difficulties and have to be tackled

 

slowly and carefully. Those diary appointments have to wait.

 

Caesarean mothers can also find they need to break wind more often. Post-

 

operative wind may also cause discomfort and pain in the abdomen and elsewhere

 

in the body – even in the shoulders – due to pockets of air being trapped.

 

There is also the scar; usually a horizontal cut of about 5-6 inches (12-15 cms) is

 

made just below the pubic hairline. The upper portion of pubic hair is shaved and

 

can often be itchy as it grows back. Not an easy area to scratch, especially with

 

the presence of a tender scar!

 

In our society many of us are dependent upon our cars for transport. Insurance

 

companies may not cover caesarean mothers for up to six weeks following the

 

operation. Mothers may not, in any case, feel physically strong enough to control

 

a vehicle, especially in an emergency situation.

 

Many household chores may be difficult or impossible for caesarean mothers for

 

some weeks after the birth. These can include: changing duvet covers;

 

vacuuming; lifting heavier objects (laundry baskets, toddlers); carrying

 

something as light as a newborn baby up and down stairs; stretching up to reach

 

high cupboards or peg out washing.

 

If this is not a first baby, a caesarean mother will find it difficult to pick up or

 

cuddle her other children. here is also a longer hospital stay, commonly around

 

five days, meaning a longer separation from her family, which can be problematic.

 

Some unlucky caesarean mothers suffer post-operative infections. (In UK

 

hospitals around 20 per cent of mothers end up with totally new infections – for

 

caesarean mothers the risk is even higher.) Depending on the type, severity and

 

response to treatment, these can sometimes be quite distressing and can slow the

 

recovery rate quite considerably.

 

And then of course there are the risks. Caesarean section is major surgery and

 

complications can occur. Mothers die very rarely these days, but the risk of

 

maternal death is higher with caesarean section than with vaginal birth, as is the

 

risk of needing a hysterectomy. Scar tissue or adhesions may cause long- term

 

pain, bowel obstruction, infertility or miscarriage and may make repeat surgery

 

more difficult. Caesarean mothers are also at increased risk of ectopic pregnancy,

 

placenta previa and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies.2

 

A caesarean is not without risk to the baby either. Babies are occasionally cut by

 

the surgeon’s scalpel. Babies who are born by caesarean section have a higher

 

incidence of respiratory problems both at birth an in adult life3,4.

 

Perhaps a caesarean is not quite as practical a solution to the problem of bringing

 

a baby into the world as it might at first seem. But even women who are well

 

informed of the realities of caesarean birth maintain a preference for this form of

 

delivery. Why have we reached the point where women are prepared to face the

 

risks and inconveniences of major abdominal surgery in order to avoid giving birth

 

to their own babies?

 

What does the tried and tested, ‘old-fashioned’ vaginal birth process have to offer

 

by comparison?

 

Recent decades have not given ‘normal’ birth a good press. Admittedly outcome

 

statistics have improved dramatically. Mothers die in childbirth so rarely these

 

days that maternal mortality is measured per 10,000 or even per 100,000. Babies

 

are also expected to survive, the perinatal mortality rate is down to 8.7 per 1,000

 

births5. However there is much confusion over the reasons behind these low

 

death rates with many people believing they are purely the result of advances in

 

medical care (which has been shown not to be the case)6.

 

Birth is seen as a medical event. Antenatal visits, medical checks and procedures

 

are understood by prospective parents as being necessary to the health and well-

 

being of their unborn child. Compliance with the system is believed to guarantee a

 

healthy baby. Non-compliance implies the mother is prepared to risk her baby’s

 

life or health. The majority of mothers, therefore, have little option but to

 

acquiesce and accept, without argument or question, the standard care provided

 

by our hospital maternity services.

 

Vaginal birth has changed. It is no longer a private time where women give birth

 

to their babies themselves, supported and cared for by a few known, trusted, and

 

accepted attendants in a familiar atmosphere.

 

What is happening is that the advantages of delivery by caesarean section are

 

being measured against the disadvantages of what vaginal birth has become in

 

today’s modern environment. The reasons women are opting for caesareans have

 

more to do with the unacceptability of what happens during what passes as

 

‘normal’ labour and birth, than the appeal of major surgery. The realities of what

 

women experience in our labour wards today is hardly inspiring.

 

Vaginal birth today usually takes place in unfamiliar, medicalised surroundings,

 

which are at odds with the private and intimate nature of the birth process. Most

 

women no longer feel safe without all the ‘just-in-case’ technology, but neither

 

are many able to feel relaxed and comfortable in its presence.

 

Vaginal birth today usually takes place in front of strangers. Trying to form a

 

formal, business-like relationship with a professional whilst semi-naked and

 

trying to go with the flow of a primal natural process can be difficult,

 

embarrassing and demeaning (and is sometimes a downright impossibility).

 

Vaginal birth today involves the need to make frequent, intellectual decisions and

 

give consent for procedures under the least conducive of circumstances.

 

Vaginal birth today involves technology, but its use can be frightening in this

 

context. The purpose of the technology used and the procedures associated with

 

it are often poorly understood, sometimes unexpected, and are frequently

 

associated with unpleasant or painful sensations and invasion of privacy, often by

 

strangers.

 

Vaginal birth today is portrayed as being dangerous for the baby. Women

 

sometimes have difficulty in believing that an experience that can be so awful for

 

them, can be any better for their baby. The emphasis on electronic fetal

 

monitoring adds substantially to the impression that the baby is in great danger.

 

Vaginal birth is generally painful. Fear and tension change hormonal states,

 

physically increasing levels of pain, often to a point where women can no longer

 

cope without analgesics.

 

Vaginal birth today involves an invasion of privacy that would be totally

 

unacceptable in any other setting. Vaginal examinations are commonplace,

 

frequent and may be carried out by different people, none of whom may be known

 

to the woman and some of whom may not even introduce themselves.

 

Vaginal birth today carries a risk of episiotomy. The idea of someone taking a

 

knife or scissors to any area of the body, especially the vagina, is a terrifying

 

prospect for any woman.

 

Vaginal birth can be messy. It is usually hard work and women often perspire

 

heavily. There are other body fluids involved too – the amniotic fluid, urine and

 

blood – and there is the placenta (afterbirth).

 

Vaginal birth can take a long time and can sometimes be quite boring. Women are

 

likely to find themselves immobilised on a narrow bed, strapped up to various

 

machines, possibly numb from the waist down, with nothing to occupy the mind

 

between the often difficult intellectual ‘choices’ that must be made – except of

 

course the monitors and a sleepy, bored partner who hasn’t even managed to

 

locate a comfortable chair.

 

No, what passes for ‘normal’ vaginal birth as it is commonly experienced in our

 

hospitals today is certainly not most people’s idea of an uplifting experience! The

 

disadvantages of major surgery begin to look less off-putting and after all, the

 

operation has become so much safer these days that the risks are relatively small

 

and can therefore easily be dismissed.

 

Despite all this, the vast majority of women would still prefer to have a normal,

 

straightforward vaginal birth. However, the sad fact is the majority of modern

 

mothers look back on their birthing experience negatively. Vaginal birth today is

 

no longer the natural process that has served the human race so well for

 

millennia. Measures and treatments that were devised to help the small minority

 

of mothers and babies who needed assistance are now being applied to the vast

 

majority. Recent studies have shown that fewer than 10% of women have a

 

‘completely natural birth’7,8.

 

So what are the advantages and practicalities that leave mothers who have had

 

positive experiences of vaginal birth wondering why on earth anyone would prefer

 

an operative delivery?

 

Normal, straightforward, intervention-free, healthy, natural birth is still the

 

safest, most practical and advantageous way for a baby to be born.

 

Babies born vaginally have a lower risk of respiratory problems. It is widely

 

accepted that the contractions of labour help prepare the baby’s lungs to breathe

 

air. Babies born by caesarean section have a higher risk of respiratory distress

 

syndrome than babies born vaginally at the same gestational age.3 Adults with

 

asthma are more likely to have been delivered by caesarean section compared

 

with adults without asthma.4

 

It is also widely acknowledged that the baby plays a part in deciding when the

 

time is right to be born. It has been commented that babies born by elective

 

caesarean section can show signs of being angry and do not appreciate being

 

delivered before they are ready.

 

The passage down the birth canal also gives a baby a wonderful all-over massage

 

that wakes up various systems in the body – cranial osteopaths claim to be able to

 

detect whether a baby was born vaginally or by caesarean.

 

Mothers who feel safe, confident and well supported rarely find the level of pain

 

reaches the point where it becomes unbearable. Their hormonal state supports

 

the process rather than fighting against it. Labour is not perceived as being a trial,

 

the pain is more like that experienced by athletes when they are giving their all

 

and trying their hardest. Labour and birth are often the hardest physical work a

 

modern woman ever has to do, but can also be the most rewarding.

 

A mother who has experienced a natural birth can generally walk unaided after

 

the birth and can begin caring for her baby straightaway.

 

More Benefits

 

A mother who has experienced a natural birth is usually able to become involved

 

in family life within hours of the birth and can get back to normal daily life within

 

just a few days. Diary appointments can generally be attended, albeit with a baby

 

present!

 

Mothers who have experienced natural birth are often able to drive very soon

 

after the birth. It has been known for mothers to drive the same day of the birth

 

and most feel fully confident after just a couple of days.

 

When the birth has gone well, the baby is often peaceful, quiet and relaxed.

 

When the birth has gone well mothers feel stronger, both physically and

 

emotionally. There is a wonderful sense of achievement and peace, of strength

 

and control, of health and completeness, of being able to cope and get on with life

 

in general. It is a very positive life-changing experience.

 

That women are prepared to opt for major surgery in preference to undergoing

 

labour and birth in our hospitals is an indictment of the maternity services.

 

Normal, healthy women carrying healthy, term babies no longer feel safe and

 

confident about giving birth under the current model of care. Until such time when

 

true midwifery can come to the fore and women are given the emotional support

 

that they need, then it is likely that numbers of women needing to opt out by

 

requesting surgery will continue to rise.

 

In this 21st century there are two routes of birth, one is abdominally via

 

caesarean section and the other is vaginally through the birth canal. As long as

 

vaginal birth remains an unacceptable option women will continue to need the

 

only other possibility available to them.

 

There are many very good reasons for having a caesarean section and with a little

 

forethought and planning the operation can indeed be a wonderful experience.

 

There is also no denying that a positive caesarean section is infinitely preferable

 

to a traumatic vaginal delivery.

 

But what too many have lost sight of, is that even the best caesarean can never

 

hold a candle to a good experience of giving birth to your baby yourself.

 

References

National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report, RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, October 2001, p96

Obstetric Myths versus Research Realities by Henci Goer, Bergin & Garvey, 1995, p23

A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy & Childbirth, Second Edition, by Murray Enkin, Marc JNC Keirse, Mary Renfrew and James Neilson, Oxford University Press, 1996, p287

AIMS Occasional Paper ‘Risks of Caesarean Section – research papers’ compiled by Beverley Beech, Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services, p2

CESDI 5th Annual Report, Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, May 1998, p18

Safer Childbirth? A critical history of maternity care, by Marjorie Tew, Chapman and Hall, 1990

Birth in Britain Today Survey 2001, Mother and Baby magazine

Labour interventions associated with normal birth, by Soo Downe, Carol McCormick and Beverley Lawrence Beech, British Journal of Midwifery, October 2001, Vol 9, No 10, p602-606

Gina Lowdon and Debbie Chippington Derrick

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email