PUT THE POLITICIANS ON THE MINIMUM WAGE AND WATCH HOW FAST THINGS CHANGE
Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?

INTO THE UNKNOWN

The Landworker- Unite the Union
 
Post Brexit: farming and agriculture lie in limbo
 
Uncertainty for the rural economy, agricultural workers, farming and food
 
processing and distribution abound as the recent referendum vote kicks
 
up a storm of confusion about the future.
 
Until the dust settles there are a few certainties to base
 
any kind of future policies on.
 
The bad news is those certainties are the uncertainty itself,
 
a degree of discontent and division, an unstable pound and political,
 
trade, tariff, economic and employment concerns.
 
None of those are good for the rural economy,
 
those who work and live in rural areas nor the general population
 
that relies on the end products to feed themselves.
 
And no one knows the detail of what Brexit will look
 
like as there is currently no agreed exit plan.
 
“It’s a mess,” Unite national officer Julia Long told Landworker.
 
“The government had no contingency plans in the event of a
 
vote to leave the EU and the Leave campaign left more questions
 
than answers about what the future might hold on Brexit.”
 
There was no shortage of industry warnings from independent experts
 
about risks facing agriculture in the event of a leave vote.
 
Warwick University’s Professor Wyn Grant warned in a specially commissioned
 
report in February that the lack of any contingency
 
planning for Brexit would lead to greater uncertainty for farmers.
 
A Brexit without farm subsidies would put many farmers in jeopardy,
 
he warned.
 
Professor Grant also cautioned those who thought a Brexit
 
would see an end to regulations.
 
“There is a perception in the industry,” he said, “that leaving the EU would reduce
 
the burden of regulation.
 
There are legal complexities which have not been considered.”
 
And there was no shortage of promises from the Leave campaigns
 
as they attempted to fill in their own blanks on how they would
 
head off any negative impact of Brexit.
 
Key Brexiteers promised that all direct and indirect agricultural payments to
 
farming would stay in place.
 
But there is no agreement on what the amount of direct and
 
indirect farm payments totals, nor certainty about what promises will be kept.
 
Brexit supporting farm minister George Eustice put a £2bn a year price tag on
 
those subsidies.
 
His own department, the department for the environment, food and
 
rural affairs gave it a £3bn a year price tag.
 
These payments help sustain the security of food supply, reduce the cost of food
 
and support the environment and help the rural economy.
 
And while exact figures are difficult to agree, they amount to over half
 
the income of farms.

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email