Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?

BUY BRITISH – UK Farmers concerned over reports that the government is planning to slash tariffs on food imports from the US as part of a planned Trade Deal  -IS US MEAT FULL OF HORMONES ?

Liz Truss is planning ‘big concession package’ in trade deal with Donald Trump

Thursday, 14 May 2020 3:57 PM  [ Last Update: Thursday, 14 May 2020 5:38 PM ]

US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)

A pig farm in Iowa ( (Scott Olson 2020 Getty Images) )


Liz Truss, the UK’s international trade secretary, is reportedly preparing a “big concession package” to offer Washington as part of negotiations which began recently with both sides eager to do a deal before the presidential elections in November.

Foodstuffs are usually lower priced in the US than in the UK, partly due to a less rigorous animal welfare regime, and American farmers have complained of being excluded from European markets by high tariffs.

British farmers, who fear their produce could be undercut on price if ministers fail to insist on tough requirements for imports to meet current UK standards, which would exclude US products like chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-pumped beef, are likely to resist any such tariff cuts.

The National Farmers Union international trade director, Nick von Westenholz, told the Financial Times that the agricultural sector would be “very concerned” about the proposals.

“Any concessions UK negotiators give on market access – such as lower or zero tariffs on agricultural goods – must be accompanied by clear conditions on how those goods have been produced,” he said. “Anything else would represent a clear breach of the government’s own explicit red lines in trade negotiations.”

There was no immediate response from the Department for International Trade to the report, which said proposals had caused tension with George Eustice’s environment department.

The government last night defeated a backbench bid to guarantee post-Brexit food imports will match the UK’s high food and environmental standards.

Conservative MPs Simon Hoare and Neil Parish led the push for the new Agriculture Bill to require a level playing field between British farmers and those overseas in future trade agreements.

The amendment was defeated by a majority of 51 after environment minister Victoria Prentis told the Commons that all food coming into the country under post-Brexit trade deals “will be required to meet existing import requirements”.

Mr Parish, chairman of the Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, told MPs Ms Truss “should actually spend her time going out and dealing with a trade deal that has equivalence and makes sure we actually export our very important animal and environmental welfare”.

He added: “I’d say to the Americans, why don’t you upgrade your production? Why don’t you reduce the density of population of your chicken? Why don’t you reduce the amount of antibiotics you’re using and then you can actually produce better chicken not only for America, it can also come into this country.”

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email