PUT THE POLITICIANS ON THE MINIMUM WAGE AND WATCH HOW FAST THINGS CHANGE
Civilisation has operated in two ways - To make one part of society more affluent and the other more wretched than would have been the lot of either in a natural state
There are Natural Rights and Civil Rights. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Where Our Power to Execute Our Natural Rights is Perfect, Government has No Legitimate Jurisdiction
When the Forces for War are Greater than the Forces for Peace   Then the World is in Danger
Politics is not a Dirty Word. It is a Way of Life. How is Your Way of Life Today ?
Covid Vaccination

A WHOLE NEW BALLGAME EMERGES OVER THE SAFETY OF THE VACCINATION PROGRAMME -THE “BASE” LINE – THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH – THE DOCTOR “DOES YOU NO HARM”- “THE OPERATION WAS A GREAT SUCCESS – UNFORTUNATELY THE PATIENT DIED”

 Covid Vaccination

“NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions”

BUT THEY DID GIVE IT !

WHEN WERE THEY TOLD ?

AND WHAT ELSE ? – NOTHING HAS BEEN MADE PUBLIC !

WILL YOU BE THE GUINEA PIG BECAUSE OF THE PRESSURE PUT ON THE PUBLIC TO BE VACCINATED BY THE BBC & STATE MEDIA.

SHOULD THE PATIENT NOT HAVE HAD A RECORDED COPY OF THE MEDICAL EXAMINATION BEFORE BEING GIVEN THE VACCINE AND THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SAFETY OF ITS ADMINISTRATION FALL ON THE NHS ?

FILLING IN A FORM TO ABSOLVE THE NHS FROM LIABILITY DOES NOT WASH BECAUSE NO PATIENT CAN BE COMPETENT TO MAKE HIS OWN MEDICAL JUDGEMENT.

AND BECAUSE MEDICAL RECORDS GET “LOST” SHOULD NOT THE PATIENT INDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT HAVE A COPY OF HIS MEDICAL NOTES IF REQUESTED BEFORE SUMBITTING TO A PROCEDURE AS SIGNIFICANT AS THIS NEW AND TO MANY INSUFFICIENTLY TRIED VACCINE

 
 
HAS THE NHS DECIDED WHO SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT HAVE THE VACCINE, IN ADVANCE, BASED ON MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE AND EVIDENCE OF THE STATE OF THE PATIENT AT THE TIME OF HAVING THE VACCINE –
 
IT APPEARS NOT IN THE CASE OF THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF ALLERGIC REACTIONS.
 

SHOULD GETTING  MEDICALLY CHECKED & THIS RECORDED BEFORE YOU HAVE THE VACCINE COMPULSORY, SO THAT IF YOU REACT BADLY TO IT YOU HAVE A CLAIM  AGAINST THE NHS.

 
 DO PATIENTS  HAVE A CLAIM  AGAINST THE NHS
IF THEY REACT  BADLY TO EITHER VACCINE DOSES AND NEED TO MAKE A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES OR HAS THE NHS A NO LIABILITY CLAUSE ADDED ALREADY AND  HAS THIS BEEN MADE CLEAR TO EACH PATIENT BEFORE THE PROCEDURE ?
THIS IS THE CASE WITH THE MANUFACTURER
 
COPYRIGHT REQUIRES NO REFERENCE WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION
 
Copy to MP

——————————–

Two health service workers experienced symptoms after receiving Pfizer vaccine

 A Covid vaccination hub at Croydon University hospital in London. Photograph: Getty Images

 

 Health editor

 
 

People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine, the medicines regulator has said, after two NHS workers experienced symptoms on Wednesday.

Both of the NHS staff carry adrenaline autoinjectors, suggesting they have suffered reactions in the past. These kind of devices, of which the best-known brand is the EpiPen, administer a swift adrenaline boost to counter allergic reactions that occur when some people, for instance, eat nuts.

The patient information leaflet with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine says it should not be given to people allergic to any substance in the vaccine.

“Signs of an allergic reaction may include itchy skin rash, shortness of breath and swelling of the face or tongue,” says the leaflet.

The identities of the NHS workers and hospitals where they were vaccinated have not been disclosed. NHS England confirmed the two incidents and said all trusts had now been advised not to give the jab to people with a history of allergic reaction.

Prof Stephen Powis, the national medical director for the NHS in England, said: “As is common with new vaccines, the MHRA [Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

The MHRA advice states: “Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine.

Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.”

The NHS workers are said to have developed symptoms of “anaphylactoid reaction” shortly after receiving the vaccine, and both have recovered after treatment.

Peter Openshaw, professor of experimental medicine at Imperial College London, said: “As with all food and medications, there is a very small chance of an allergic reaction to any vaccine. However, it is important that we put this risk in perspective.

The occurrence of any allergic reaction was one of the factors monitored in the phase 3 clinical trial of this Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, the detailed data from which was released yesterday. In this, they reported a very small number of allergic reactions in both the vaccine and placebo groups (0.63% and 0.51%).

“Similar to the rollout of all new vaccines and medications, this new Covid-19 vaccine is being monitored closely by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

They will now investigate these cases in more detail to understand if the allergic reactions were linked to the vaccine or were incidental. The fact that we know so soon about these two allergic reactions and that the regulator has acted on this to issue precautionary advice shows that this monitoring system is working well.”

Stephen Evans, professor of pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: “Allergic reaction occurs with quite a number of vaccines, and perhaps even more frequently with drugs. So it is not unexpected.

“The Pfizer data showed that about 0.6% of people had some form of allergic reaction in the trial on the vaccine, but about 0.5% on placebo. So there was a genuine excess of allergic reaction but this was small and the true rate is not known, and there is a lot of uncertainty around that estimate.

“The only thing that is contraindicated with this vaccine (meaning you mustn’t have it) is hypersensitivity to the vaccine or any of the excipients (other things in the vaccine), but some people won’t know if they have hypersensitivity to some constituents of the vaccine.

“What would be wise, as the MHRA have already advised, would be for anyone who has known severe allergic reaction such that they need to carry an EpiPen, to delay having a vaccination until the reason for the allergic reaction has been clarified.”

Pfizer UK said it had been advised by MHRA of the two yellow card reports. “As a precautionary measure, the MHRA has issued temporary guidance to the NHS while it conducts an investigation in order to fully understand each case and its causes. Pfizer and BioNTech are supporting the MHRA in the investigation,” it said.

“In the pivotal phase 3 clinical trial, this vaccine was generally well tolerated with no serious safety concerns reported by the independent data monitoring committee. The trial has enrolled over 44,000 participants to date, over 42,000 of whom have received a second vaccination.”

Similar Recent Posts by this Author:

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email